Congress, RJD and other opposition parties were expecting the Supreme Court to put a brake on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise on electoral rolls going on in Bihar, but their expectations were belied.
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the Election Commission to continue with the exercise, but at the same time, it asked the EC to consider Aadhar, Voter ID card and ration card as valid documents for this exercise.
The bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said, it was prima facie of the view that EC should consider Aadhar, voter I-card and ration card as valid documents for this exercise.
The apex court held that it was the responsibility of EC to update and revise voters lists, remove incorrect entries and add new voters. On behalf of the EC, the apex court was told that the revision work would end on July 25, as more than 60 per cent forms of voters have been submitted.
The EC counsel told the court that the main purpose of SIR was to remove incorrect names from the list and the name of not a single legal voter shall be removed, nor would the right to cast vote be withheld. The apex court has sought a detailed reply from the EC on its queries within a week, after which further hearing shall take place on July 28.
Both the ruling and opposition camps described the SC order as their victory. Actually, the voter list revision process has been fully politicalized and the Supreme Court has realized this.
Question was raised as to why the necessity to check voter lists in Bihar? The answer given was, it is the responsibility of EC.
Question was raised, why is this exercise being carried out now? The answer given was, whenever elections are scheduled, voters lists need to be checked, so that no fake voter can cast a vote.
Question was asked, why 31 days were earmarked for this huge exercise? The reply was, the last intensive revision took place in Bihar in 2003, and at that time too, the time given was for 31 days. This time, voters whose names appeared in the list after 2003, will be checked and not all voters will be checked, hence 31 days are sufficient.
Question was asked, why names of voters are being verified on the basis of 11 documents and Aadhar, ration card and MNREGA card not included in the list of documents? The reply given was, these are three cards on the basis of which names of fake voters can be included. In Bihar, saturation of Aadhar card holders is more than 100 per cent. Hence, the possibility of fake Aadhar cards being misused for inclusion in voter list was more.
The Election Commission has promised that names of genuine voters will not be removed from the list, but the real problem is not related to questions and answers.
The basic problem relates to trust deficit about the Election Commission. A narrative is sought to be created to project that this intensive revision by EC is being carried out at the behest of the central government. And if the government has prodded the EC to carry out this exercise, it means, it could be a conspiracy to give advantage to the BJP.
What can anybody do in such a situation? When the number of voters increased before the Maharashtra elections, it became a problem, and when number of voters will decrease in Bihar, it will again become a problem.
There is a saying in Urdu, “Shaq Ka Ilaaj Hakeem Lukman Ke Paas Bhi Nahin Hai” (There is no treatment to cure somebody’s suspicions).
Firing at Kapil’s cafe : Canada has a lot to answer
Shots rang out outside a cafe in Canada owned by celebrity comedian Kapil Sharma. Babbar Khalsa International claimed responsibility. Harjit Singh Laddi, a Germany based Babbar Khalsa activist, claimed responsibility for firing shots at Kap’s Cafe, in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada on Wednesday night. No one was hurt.
A video clip surfaced showing an unknown man emptying bullets from a semi-automatic pistol. Laddi said, some objectionable remarks were made about Nihang Sikhs in Kapil Sharma’s TV comedy show in the past.
Such a brazen attack on Kapil Sharma’s cafe is a cowardly act. Where are those leaders in Canada who were seeking protection for Khalistani supporters in the name of freedom of expression? Where are those who had been saying that everybody has a right to express views? Has Kapil Sharma the right to express his views or not?
Can any attempt to intimidate people by citing a comedian’s remark be justified? As far as I know, Kapil Sharma never makes any remark which hurts the sensibilities of any individual or community. His only job is to make his audience laugh. Action must be taken against those who carried out this firing.